Both the overcompliance and offending are projected by the awareness of different perceptions which includes that of behavior as a thrilling to take part in, career advantages and behavior immorality. However, the two have got a variety of differences depending on the outcomes of their predictions. Firstly, the awareness of behavior as an exciting forecast offending although it does not predict the overcompliance. On the other hand, the discernments of how habits make an individual feel about his or herself predict overcompliance without predicting the offending. Secondly, offending outcomes are greately impacted by the RCT variables while the social contract morality and societal consequences explain the overcompliance.

There are higher confidences of legal sanctions which are linked to a greater likelihood of felonies in the offending model. The behavior strengthens the corporate competitive status which increases the chances to offend. On the overcompliance approach, the collar crimes are conducted as a result of no measures of company culture that affects the offending purposes. Furthermore, the overcompliance notion states that when the habit is illustrated as being usual in the firm after violating the set standards, then the felonies are likely to occur. Also, when assessing the magnitude, the corporate culture variables are smaller in the ovecompliance model as compared to the offending model. In the overcompliance, the firm culture does not have much of the effects on the behavior of the individual level while on the offending; the firm culture has got much impact on the individual level. The individual level variables must be present for the crime to occur in the overcompliance model while in the offending model the firm interests or habits predict the likelihood of a transgression.

We should care about the overcompliance because it is much predicted by the individual variables and the perception of career benefits as well as the feelings that one has pertaining particular behavior. By knowing about overcompliance, one can study the corporate crime since he or she can determine the habit that has been regarded as common while the set standards are violated. Additionally, understanding of the overcompliance helps to root the primary cause of the crime since it is based on the individual level rather than the corporate cultures. Besides, the awareness of the overcompliance implies that the failure or the crime can be conducted by different personnel, for instance, the manager within a given corporate.

The integrated theory has clearly explained the offending well where it illustrates that the organizational culture influence the likelihood of felony. The theory explains that single standard deviation rise in the apparent strictness of legal sanctions projecting 22 percent decrease in the chances of felony intentions.  Through such evidence, the theory brings out clear on how the corporate culture influences the intentions to offend. Furthermore, the integrated theory has explained the overcompliance well. The notion illustrates that individual perceived awareness creates a way for the crime to take place. Additionally, the theory provides different scenarios where overcompliance may take place which include the career advantages and the personal self-interests such of the manager. The theory is good since it incorporates both the offending and the overcompliance and how people within the corporate intend to offend. However, the theory should be improved by conducting more research on how applicable is the theory and considering other external forces that may lead to crime.